The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The given bar graph illustrates the surveying outcomes about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking hobbies in five Australian urban areas.
Overall, in the last four weeks, the most well-known selection apparently was hanging out to a coffee while the organic coffee accounted for the least percentages.
First of all, considering the off-site drinking rates of Horbart and Melbourne, they are higher than other municipal places with approximately 62 percent. In the meanwhile, the rest still accomplishes considerable proportions.
Additionally, indicated the instant coffee rates, it is clear that they are better than the fresh coffee percentages. For examples, at the same time as Brisban and Hobart get nearly 53 percent, the counterparts are less than a half. Comparing the organic coffee proportions, they have gotten a low stability for four week duration. To be more precise, the lowest are Brisban and Adelaide with more or less 43 percent. Otherwise, the others are Sydney with only 42 percent as same as Melbourne, the last is Hobart which gains about 39 percent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 545, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is Hobart which gains about 39 percent.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, still, well, while, for example, first of all, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31976744186 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89048227415 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651162790698 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.523792456 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133929043997 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544263720919 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844345873843 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104028537889 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105149730369 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.