The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian Cities
The bar chart illustrates the outcomes of a questionnaire about the consumption habits of different types of drinks of people living in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, and Hobart of Australia.
As can be seen in the diagram, the figure for people who went to a café shop for coffee or tea in the last 4 weeks shows the highest percentage in almost five cities while the figure for people who bought fresh coffee displays the lowest percentage among three types of drinks.
Looking at the diagram in more detail, the first option is bought fresh coffee in the last 4 weeks. In Sydney, around 44% of living residents take this option and has almost the same amount as Melbourne which is 42%. Brisbane and Adelaide have nearly the same number, 34.2%, and 34.4% respectively. Next is Hobert which has 38%.
The second choice is bought instant coffee in the last 4 weeks. The number of Hobart shows the highest percentage which is 54%. Next is Brisbane which has 52.5% and the other two cities, Melbourne and Adelaide show nearly the same amount, 48.9% and 50% in order. The number of Sydney has the lowest percentage, which is 46%.
The last option of the questionnaire displays the percentage of city habitats that went to a café for coffee or tea in the last 4 weeks. In Sydney, the number shows that 61% of living residents take this option. The figure for Melbourne and Hobart has an almost identical number, which is 63.5% and 63%. In Brisbane, the number of citizens that went to a café for coffee or tea is 55.4% while the lowest figure for this option is Adelaide which shows 49.9% of city residents.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 285.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71578947368 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4021996691 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.410526315789 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 382.5 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8619764869 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177704406216 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571072433712 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604295725733 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108656663904 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608765844896 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.79 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.