The bar chart demonstrates the outcome of a survey in five Australian cities about mass people's coffee and tea buying and consuming habits.
Overall, almost in all the five cities most of the people went to a cafe for coffee or tea in previous 4 weeks and least amount of people bought fresh coffee in the same amount of time. There were no general pattern or trend between the cities.
More specifically, Melbourne had the most amount of people slightly less than 65 percent in the category of going to a cafe for either of drinks, whereas, Adelaide had the least amount ( marginally less than 50 percent ) of people in the same type of all the cities. Furthermore, Sydney exhibited the least percentage of people ( slightly more than 45 percent) who bought instant coffee in last 4 weeks.
Moreover, Adelaide depicted an exception because it was the only city that had more percentage of people buying instant coffee. Interestingly, in the category of buying fresh coffee, Brisbane and Adelaide showed an identical percentage of people which was approximately 34 percent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., whereas, Adelaide had the least amount marginally less than 50 percent of peop...
^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... amount marginally less than 50 percent of people in the same type of all the ci...
^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...exhibited the least percentage of people slightly more than 45 percent who bought...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95555555556 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65055316845 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0464275826 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.428571429 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19613178739 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10544207257 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105565848963 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155036039971 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111089785269 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.