The chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart demonstrated people’s drinking coffee preferences in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart. There were three main options: buying fresh coffee, buying instant coffee and going to a café.
According to the graph, going to a café was the most popular choice for people in the five cities except those who live in Adelaide. In there, instant coffee was the top option and fresh coffee followed closely. Meanwhile, buying fresh coffee was the least common choice for people in all five cities.
Looking at the image, we can see around 64% of people in Melbourne drank a cup of coffee or tea in a café in the last 4 weeks, ranking as highest proportions among the five cities. Residents in Hobart also preferred drinking a cup of coffee or tea in a café (63%) while those who purchased instant coffee was the highest percentage (54.5%). In Brisbane and Adelaide, people rarely drank fresh coffee at home with only 34% of investigators bought coffee beans in the past four weeks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'as the highest'.
Suggestion: as the highest
... in a café in the last 4 weeks, ranking as highest proportions among the five cities. Resi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90058479532 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47648218021 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573099415205 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2807658415 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.75 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199348463682 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098735846516 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0250719736677 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148841102382 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246025412484 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.