The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart demonstrates the output of the observation from people who traveled the different types of tourist places like Historic houses and monuments, museums and galleries, wildlife parks and zoos and theme parks in London in 1999.
Overall, Most of the traveler love to visit the theme parks and museums and galleries, where the Blackpool pleasure beach in the park is significantly popular among all others. The wildlife parks and zoos are the least commonplace among the tourist during that period.
According to the chart, in 1999 the theme park is the tourist attraction with 38% visitors to Britain. The black pool pleasure beach inside the park is an attractive destination with nearly half tourist visited the theme park. The Alton towers and Pleasureland Southport has just more than 15% of tourist to visit there, whereas the Chessington world of adventure and Legoland Windsor are the least attractive destination with a tenth of theme park tourist.
Also, The museums and galleries are popular as the theme park with just a percentile less than it. Some of the visitors interests in historic houses and their ratio is 16% of total tourist in that year. Very few tourists are attracted by Zoos and wildlife parks and it is most uncommon place among them, 9% of them are willing to be there.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted the theme park. The Alton towers and Pleasureland Southport has just more tha...
^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...rk with just a percentile less than it. Some of the visitors interests in historic houses a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99543378995 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5429895671 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525114155251 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1120409031 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.555555556 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146932365557 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748228631628 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513044568212 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981025352349 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396293626838 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.