The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in 1999.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The pie chart reveals the information of proportion of visitation of four different types of tourist spots whereas the table breaks down the percentage of population who enjoyed different areas of theme parks in 1999 in the UK.
Overall, the survey showed most people choose to visit the theme parks, and museums and galleries while wildlife parks and zoos remained the lest visited area. However, for theme park, almost half of the people selected blackpool pleasure beach.
Given a close look at the pie chart, it can be observed that, theme parks and museums and galleries were attracted by two third of tourists and had only a difference of 1%. On the other hand, the percentage of the other two tourist attractions namely historic houses and monuments, and wildlife parks and zoos accounted for 16% and 9% respectively.
In regard to the table, blackpool pleasure beach was the major contributor among the theme parks, and attracted nearly half of the visitors, which was 47%. However, Chessington world of Adventures,and legoland windsor had the exactly same number of 10% people who enjoyed those place. Likewise, the remaining two theme parks ( Alton Towes and Pleasureland, Southport) showed almost similar results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...However, Chessington world of Adventures,and legoland windsor had the exactly same n...
^^^^
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Likewise, the remaining two theme parks Alton Towes and Pleasureland, Southport ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, look, so, third, whereas, while, in regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21717171717 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64398160174 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59595959596 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8595154156 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.125 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 5.23603664747 220% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164034117576 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702321449236 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460000472263 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10579396131 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411786278725 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.