The bar chart below illustrates the changes in the total time spent on three different kinds of phone calls in the UK over the period of 1995-2002.
Originally, in 1995, the British public talked over 70 billion minutes on local-fixed lines, almost a 40 on national & international and a mere one billion using mobile phones. The usage of local lines increased, reaching its maximum of 90 billion minutes in 1999. After that, it finished the period with a bit more than 70 billion minutes as it was in the beginning of the period.
Meanwhile, the mobile and national & international dialing were gaining more popularity each year. Thus, the time spent on national & international was rising gradually and ended the period up with a total time of 61 billion minutes in 2002. Although mobile phones were not used greatly at first, they obtained a modest 12 billion minutes and then grew up rapidly finishing the period with 44 billion minutes.
Overall, the usage of both mobile and national & international lines expanded significantly over the period, but local lines were still more popular.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... kinds of phone calls in the UK over the period of 1995-2002. Originally, in 1...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, still, then, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0773480663 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7151604779 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569060773481 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8995714852 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.875 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198911004693 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947150361704 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881552876316 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135871593802 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106998403086 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.