The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the amount of time that UK citizens spent on different call types over a period of 7 years.

Overall, local fixed line was the most popular in every years. However, the gaps between local fixed line, national/international fixed line and mobiles became smaller throughout the period.

In 1995, people made calls mostly by local fixed line. The figure for this call type was around 70 billion minutes, which was doubled the amount of minutes that spent on national/international calls. By contrast, mobiles only accounted for a small number of 3 billion minutes. An upward trend can be seen in the next 4 years. The amount of local calls minutes increased significantly, peaked at about 90 billion minutes. Similarly, the time spent on two other types rose by 10 billion each.

The figure for local calls declined whereas that of others grew over the following 3 years. People spent less time on local calls, at the same point as the year 1995. Nevertheless, local calls remained the most popular. In contrast, national/International calls and mobiles were used more frequently, at around 60 billion and 45 billion minutes respectively.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...By contrast, mobiles only accounted for a small number of 3 billion minutes. An upward trend can ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['however', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'similarly', 'whereas', 'in contrast']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.240740740741 0.268076937826 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.125 0.116061578633 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.106481481481 0.0759168565197 140% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0509259259259 0.0366838410393 139% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0 0.0131127313244 0% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.143518518519 0.155750635184 92% => OK
Participles: 0.037037037037 0.0379272487307 98% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.20512938312 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0 0.0210936926555 0% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.101851851852 0.0948980150116 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00462962962963 0.00437022459523 106% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0138888888889 0.00967000014798 144% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1171.0 1161.00487805 101% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.9 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.13089005236 5.90752243213 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73763899035 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.340314136126 0.337110787985 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.225130890052 0.247514529752 91% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.130890052356 0.171178102325 76% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0837696335079 0.112407865282 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20512938312 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565445026178 0.546246751206 104% => OK
Word variations: 50.9661192333 49.3433353143 103% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 8.93414634146 146% => OK
Sentence length: 14.6923076923 23.0094962315 64% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6817177418 42.9750493124 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0769230769 135.714022679 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6923076923 23.0094962315 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.461538461538 0.689975730869 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 37.2053966975 47.7609492067 78% => OK
Elegance: 2.39473684211 2.94281807926 81% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403680160611 0.418131533498 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.107945580132 0.181151798455 60% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0960493089271 0.0850326197045 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.563125845813 0.706616315825 80% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.198629215849 0.157042692854 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176239411459 0.228904883108 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505763485523 0.108899403657 46% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.289955461794 0.367819155151 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.146333607323 0.0812612215331 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281621487629 0.316326947829 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498120275678 0.0921553760075 54% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70731707317 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.08536585366 196% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.16585365854 158% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 8.0 3.02926829268 264% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 7.1512195122 182% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.