The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The bar chart describes the time spent in the UK for different types of phone calls between 1995 and 2002.
In general, it can be seen from the chart that people used local fixed-line most in the UK, the national and international fixed-line and mobiles were becoming increasingly.
Among the three categories including local-fixed line, national and international-fixed line and mobile ( all calls), local phone calls accounted for the highest proportion during the period from 1995 to 2002, rising from about 72 billion minutes in 1995 to 90 billion minutes in 1995. However, after peaking in 1999, these calls had fallen back to 1995 in 2002.
On the other hand, national and international fixed-line calls rose regularly from around 38 billion minutes to approximately 61 billion minutes at the end of the period. However, the number of munites of telephone calls grown slowly over the last two years.
Besides, the most noticeable change was the trend of cellphones. There was a dramatic increase in this mobile calls from 2 billion minutes in 1995 to about 46 billion minutes in 2002. Especially, this rise was particular pay attention between 1999 and 2002, during this period the use of mobile phones tripled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and international-fixed line and mobile all calls, local phone calls accounted f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76441223409 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7651942677 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24647858653 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109427115041 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708125062627 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143170997519 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477386630414 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.