The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates the billion-minute changes in phone calls in the 1995-2002 period in the UK.
The first impression is that among three categories, local fixed-line was the most common type which was followed by national/international fixed-line and mobiles respectively. While the total figures of local fixed-line dropped consistently after a steady improvement, the other types of call witnessed an overall improvement throughout the years.
In particular, a peak can be observed in the local fixed-line category which was at 90 billion minutes in 1999. Despite that, the national/international fixed line’s highest point occurred at the end of the analyzed phase, at subtly over 60 billion minutes. It can be seen from the graph that British people spent an increasing amount of time making telephone calls on mobile devices. The differences were quite substantial, starting from only 3 billion minutes in 1995 to 45 billion minutes in 2002. Another outstanding feature is that the gap between these three phone calls had been closer, which saw its smallest in 2002 when the total numbers of minutes spent were 72, 61, and 45 billion minutes in the same order.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28723404255 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24753972414 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63829787234 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4691539803 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.25 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229303138264 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107710509823 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744352473278 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160374994024 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862065307895 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.