The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparison where relevant.
The chart gives the account of telephone calls in minutes in the UK, categorized into three types within seven years (1995-2002).
In general,the gradual increase in mobile calls is observed throughout the year although local calls are facing with a decreasing trend whereas the national and international calls increase at the end of the period.
People did the least phone calls in 1995 although more telecommunication is being carried out throughout the years. Despite of a decline trend, local calls stand as the highest in dialing with the peak at 90 billion minutes in both 1998 and 1997. Starting from 2000, the later years witnessed less local call with just over 70 billion minutes in 2002, which has the same record in 1995.
Contractingly, national and international call logs are steadily increasing ;reaching at 60 billion calls minute. It illustrates the gap between the local calls and international calls being narrowed in which it was nearly 30 billions minutes in gap while it is less than 10 billions minutes.
To sum up, mobile calls become more common as the year goes on while international calls are increasing with the decline in local calls.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...hin seven years 1995-2002. In general,the gradual increase in mobile calls is obs...
^^^^
Line 9, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...than 10 billions minutes. To sum up, mobile calls become more common as the y...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, while, in general, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10880829016 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76625714314 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564766839378 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6800302172 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.25 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199864878951 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106857902063 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731736105879 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131793243257 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848054315791 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.