The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 to 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart illustrates the sum of minutes in billions when people make phone calls, which is divided into three different categories in the UK for seven years from 1995s. Overall, using mobiles and making national, as well as international had become more popular year after year.
Regarding the graph, in 1995, the total time for local phone calls including fixed-line was 72 billion minutes, which was nearly double the total national/ international phone calls, 38 billion minutes. However, at that time, less than 5 billion minutes belonged to mobile calling, consisting of local, national, and international calls.
Local phone calls had reached the peak in 1999 with 90 billion minutes before gradually dropping to the same number in 2002, but still the highest among those classification. Two other ones had the same trend of progression. The national and overseas fixed line of calling increased stably from 38 billion minutes to around 60 billion minutes while the acceleration of cellphones in all calls was nearly tenth times, which was 4 billion minutes from the beginning then reached 45 billion minutes in the end.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this classification' or 'those classifications'?
Suggestion: this classification; those classifications
...er in 2002, but still the highest among those classification. Two other ones had the same trend of p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, still, then, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21978021978 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63914774752 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637362637363 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.1624709718 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.714285714 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246459138195 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105532890917 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844865890393 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162589922859 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385645374326 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this classification' or 'those classifications'?
Suggestion: this classification; those classifications
...er in 2002, but still the highest among those classification. Two other ones had the same trend of p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, still, then, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21978021978 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63914774752 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637362637363 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.1624709718 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.714285714 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246459138195 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105532890917 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844865890393 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162589922859 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385645374326 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.