The bar chart illustrates the duration of the telephone calls by three call types in the UK during the period of 1995-2002.
It is clear that the local fixed line was the most popular phone conversation throughout the period. The time spent on local fixed line increased gradually from 72 billion minutes in 1995 to the peak of 90 billion minutes in 1995, following that the time spent on local fixed line decreased steadily and dropped back to the 1995 figures.
Meanwhile, both call duration of national and international fixed line and mobiles increased from 1995 to 2002. In 1995, the mobiles call was much more unpopular than other type of phone calls, with only 3 billion minutes of call duration. The total time spent on mobiles, however, increased by 4 times during the period. In particular, the rise from 1999 to 2002 was noticeable. In contrast, the usage of national and international fixed line grew steadily from 38 billion to 61 billion minutes at the end of period.
Overall, the local-fixed line remained the dominant type of phone call. While the usage of mobiles increased dramatically in these years, there was still a considerable difference between the time spent on mobiles and local fixed line.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... spent on mobiles and local fixed line.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, still, while, in contrast, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97087378641 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62924022067 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495145631068 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.010611096 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181593968282 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870198684772 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724984574959 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137336074221 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873292909796 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.