The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 - 2002.
The bar graph illustrates the number of minutes used telephone calls in three primary categories namely local – fixed line, national and international – fixed line, and mobiles in Britain over a period of 7 years between 1995 and 2002.
Overall, it is clear that most people used local - fixed line among the three surveyed; however, the figure decreased over the time shown while the other two significantly increased. Units are measured in billion minutes.
In 1995, the number of minutes used by local – fixed line was at approximately 70 billion minutes, nearly 2 times higher than that of national and international – fixed line. Then, the former saw a gradual rise of around 20 billion minutes in the next 3 years before tumbling to the same amount as at the beginning in 2002. However, the later witnessed a dramatic increase to over 60 billion minutes over the period surveyed.
Meanwhile, the total of minutes of mobiles (all calls) was merely below 5 million minutes in 1995 and it remained below 10 million minutes until 1998. After that, the figure rose significantly to nearly 45 billion minutes in the end.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...cantly increased. Units are measured in billion minutes. In 1995, the number of minu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95287958115 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57988681384 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570680628272 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6070465633 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25323465818 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108291573401 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626163889676 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155561249774 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671968325828 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.