The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, Divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
The bar graph shows three telephone call categories around 1995-2002 in the UK and the total number of minutes (in billion) which the categories are “local-fixed line”, national and international fixed line”, and “mobile (all calls).
According to the graph local-fixed line becomes the most popular telephone category, even though it’s fluctuated after reach the highest number, which is 90 minutes in 1999. After reach that point, local – fixed line slightly decreased every year until the end of 2002. The starting point and the ending point are in the same total number of minutes, which is little bit above 70.
Contradicting with local-fixed line, National and International – fixed line and mobiles constantly increase each years. Compare the both of them, mobile magnificently increase than the national and international – fixed line. It can be seen by the total number of minutes of mobile in the beginning of 1995 which no more than 5 minutes, but in the end in 2002, approximately 50 minutes in a year. It is increase 1000% or ten times compare with the beginning.
Around 1995 until 2002, the increation of the total number of minutes of national and international is stable. Little bit below 40 minutes at 1995 and step by step increase each year until up to 60 minutes in 2002, in average 2-3 minutes of increation on a single year.
Some thing interest come from the chart is the gap between local-fixed line and mobile. Seventy minutes gap in 1995 but in 2002 the gap is just around 30 minutes. In the future, we can predict the popularity of mobile will beat local-fixed line.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 117, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
... UK and the total number of minutes (in billion) which the categories are 'local f...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 362, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
... same total number of minutes, which is little bit above 70. Contradicting with local ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 113, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: Little; Bit
...f national and international is stable. Little bit below 40 minutes at 1995 and step by st...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 2, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'Something'?
Suggestion: Something
...tes of increation on a single year. Some thing interest come from the chart is the gap...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.242236024845 0.268076937826 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.11801242236 0.116061578633 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.083850931677 0.0759168565197 110% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0310559006211 0.0366838410393 85% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0124223602484 0.0131127313244 95% => OK
Prepositions: 0.142857142857 0.155750635184 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0465838509317 0.0379272487307 123% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61794038316 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00621118012422 0.0210936926555 29% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.10248447205 0.0948980150116 108% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00931677018634 0.00437022459523 213% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0155279503106 0.00967000014798 161% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1639.0 1161.00487805 141% => OK
No of words: 279.0 196.9 142% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87455197133 5.90752243213 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.73763899035 109% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.293906810036 0.337110787985 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.229390681004 0.247514529752 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.143369175627 0.171178102325 84% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.089605734767 0.112407865282 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61794038316 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483870967742 0.546246751206 89% => OK
Word variations: 46.4409472331 49.3433353143 94% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 8.93414634146 146% => OK
Sentence length: 21.4615384615 23.0094962315 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2527095546 42.9750493124 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.076923077 135.714022679 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 23.0094962315 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.230769230769 0.689975730869 33% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.84146341463 130% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.48048780488 270% => OK
Readability: 44.4006065619 47.7609492067 93% => OK
Elegance: 2.67307692308 2.94281807926 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.553758313116 0.418131533498 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.163954658839 0.181151798455 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0903095040066 0.0850326197045 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.6528422147 0.706616315825 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.150425026162 0.157042692854 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.256828973591 0.228904883108 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135445022255 0.108899403657 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.398110581768 0.367819155151 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0648899830209 0.0812612215331 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.385757294222 0.316326947829 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214881094264 0.0921553760075 23% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70731707317 270% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 3.16585365854 316% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 7.1512195122 182% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 70.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 6.5 Out of 9