The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The vertical bar graph elucidates the information on how earnings are calculated on various goods exportation in a country during the years 2015 and 2016, and the table illustrates the further percentage changes among these goods during the years.
Overall, the column graph highlights that at the beginning of the year in 2015, petroleum depicted a fair proportion, while the demand for textiles noticed low rates. Similarly, at the end of the period, petroleum and engineered goods are most popular with agricultural products as least amongst all. However, as per the data from the table, all categories saw an increase in percentage change over the period with gems and jewellery as exceptional.
The bar chart reveals that the trade of petrol-based units started with nearly 61 billion dollars in 2016, and it rose by 3 billion in 2016. In the same fashion, engineering and agriculture units saw a gradual incline in the market. Also, although the textile group initiated with a quarter billion, the figures skyrocketed by nearly 7 billion in 2016.
Furthermore, the table portrayed the items with regard to agriculture and petroleum accounted for less than 5% variation from 2015 to 2016, whereas textiles topped with 15.24% change at the end of the period. On the other hand, gems and jewellery class dropped its exports by 5.18% over the years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
... how earnings are calculated on various goods exportation in a country during the yea...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... among these goods during the years. Overall, the column graph highlights tha...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 451, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with gems and jewellery as exceptional. The bar chart reveals that the trade of ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ocketed by nearly 7 billion in 2016. Furthermore, the table portrayed the ite...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llery class dropped its exports by 5.18% over the years.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, similarly, so, well, whereas, while, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1151.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18468468468 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72930228866 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9625707386 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.888888889 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8888888889 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276760755965 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969260227716 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790389173796 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163904679898 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683742004768 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.