The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015
The bar graph illustrates the amount generated (in billion dollars) by a country from exporting products from five categories in 2015 and 2016 and the table gives the percentage proportional change in value between these two years.
Overall, petroleum products and engineered goods were the highest exported goods of the five categories for both years and there was a positive rise in the amount generated from the exports of products from various categories except gems and jewellery.
In 2015, petroleum products were mostly sold out of the country generating slightly more than $60 billion. This was followed closely by engineered goods at a value of more than $50 billion and gems and jewellery contributing almost $45 billion. Agricultural produce and textiles were the least exported at slightly more than $30 billion and $25 billion respectively.
In 2016, petroleum products and engineered goods were still highly exported with a 3% and 8.5% increment from the 2015 value respectively. Interestingly, the worth of exported gems decreased by 5.18% to almost $40 billion while there was only a minimal increase of 0.81% in agricultural produce. Textile had the most significant increase of 15.24% from its 2015 value to more than $30 billion by 2016.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...aph illustrates the amount generated in billion dollars by a country from exporting pro...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22885572139 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87803957655 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487562189055 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9097108289 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.375 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244216666837 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122432057211 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872567811592 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176023156405 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806498645157 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.