the chart below shows what anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in works after 5 years. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The pie graph and table illustrated both after-graduated occupations of people who done studying in the anthropology sector at university and their monthly paycheck after 5 years working.
Overall, the first diagram indicates the percentage of employments in which full-time jobs account for a vast majority. Another one enumerates the distribution of wages in 3 areas following salary levels.
In the pie chart, the highest portion is a full-time job with 52%, gained more than a half. In the meantime, doing part-time work along with studying postgrad takes 5%, the smallest one in the diagram. On the one hand, part-time job accomplishes 15%, a relative number while unemployed people only achieve 12%. Finally, people studying full-time postgrad and who have never known are gaining the same proportion with 8%.
In the table, considering Freelance mentors, people whose having 100,000 monthly wages are as same as those in level 75000-99,999 with 40%. Different from recently showed data, government area takes 50% having 100,000 and 30% possessing 75,000-99,999 while these rates in private companies are 30% and 25% comparing relevant levels. Finally, at level 25,000-49,999 and 50,000-74,999, freelance consultants and government sector are the same (5% and 15%). In contrast, with private companies, the numbers are 10% and 35%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 520, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...companies, the numbers are 10% and 35%.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1134.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47826086957 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96272753388 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632850241546 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6389985902 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.090909091 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113339035073 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406162824691 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635344390649 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0830065159328 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834158399327 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.