The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
https://www.ielts-practice.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/image.png
The proportion of different types of jobs employed by Anthropology students in a single university after having finished their undergraduate course in depicted in the pie chart, while the table illustrates the amount of income after five years working of anthropologists. Overall, the statistic in the pie chart indicates that the majority of Anthropology graduates are employed with a full-time job and the figure for wage of more than 100,000 USD accounts for the highest percentage.
It can be seen clearly from the pie chart that the number of graduated anthropology students who occupied in a full-time work made up of slightly above 50% which is approximately 4 times as much as that of unemployed ones. Furthermore, the data of full-time postgraduate study and those who remain unknown are similar with nearly 10%. The remaining criteria including part-time work together with pursuing further education, part-time occupation and unemployed ranges from 5% to 15%.
Moving on to describe the table, the proportion of graduated Anthropology students occupied in Freelance consultants whose wage ranges from 75,000 to 99.999 USD and above 100.000USD are equal with 40% which are much higher than that of the two remaining salaries ranges. Meanwhile, Anthropologists with the salaries of more than one hundred thousand USD account for a half of Government sector. However, with the majority of people working for private companies earn 50,000 to nearly 75,000 USD which is 5% higher than that of 100,000 USD.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30833333333 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98718327005 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558333333333 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.2945893095 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.25 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181014689588 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830831030585 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945666223139 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129417708262 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836748177635 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 61.2550243902 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.