The Chart derives the annual number of rentals and sales of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011. Desribe the whole chart.

Essay topics:

The Chart derives the annual number of rentals and sales of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011. Desribe the whole chart.

The given chart derives the annual number of rentals and sales of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011.

It can be seen that from the chart that there were four formats, rental, VHS sales, dvd sales and Blu-ray sales. Annual number of rentals was approx 1,70,000 in starting year 2002. However, after that the number of went down gradually and at last annual number of rental was 51,000 in the year 2011. Other hand, dvd sales which was start very less annual number of sales and it was 49,000 approximately in 2002. However after that the yearly number of sales climbed up smoothly 2003 to 2007. The sales of touched a high point in 2007.

Overall, from the chart it can be seen that annual number of Blu-ray sales was very low.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...nd it was 49,000 approximately in 2002. However after that the yearly number of sales c...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 616.0 965.302439024 64% => OK
No of words: 135.0 196.424390244 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56296296296 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.4086580994 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.96590973786 2.65546596893 74% => OK
Unique words: 70.0 106.607317073 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 164.7 283.868780488 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0357326573 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 5.23603664747 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466602113485 0.215688989381 216% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.231061649827 0.103423049105 223% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.225125273547 0.0843802449381 267% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.44320393657 0.15604864568 284% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.259909088008 0.0819641961636 317% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.