The chart show the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.
The bar chart compares the percentage of men and women teachers in six kinds of educational institution in the UK in 2010.
In general terms, women were more likely to hold the more typically maternal role of teaching young childrens. In contrast, men predominated in the higher status teaching role of university lecturer.
It is clear from the bar chart shows that in 2010, females predominated in schools for children. This was particularly true of schools for very young. Females accounted over 95% of nursery school teachers. The figure was similarly in primary school, where over 90% of teachers were women while the percentage of men teachers accounted only under 5% and under 10% od pre-school and primary school respectively.
On the other hand, males and females were more equally represented in teaching for older children and young adults of secondary schools and colleges. For example, college lecturers were 50% women and 50% men. however, males accounted a larger percentage of teaching in higher-level in stitutions. This was particularly true for universities, where over twice as many males were teaching staff than females.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 210, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...e lecturers were 50% women and 50% men. however, males accounted a larger percentage of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, similarly, while, for example, in contrast, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26229508197 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85186225778 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551912568306 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6577771387 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5454545455 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198314268022 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833192964725 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108114986587 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148172925162 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137452028914 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.