The presented column graph compares employees from 7 distinct nations in terms of their total salary in 2004.
Overall, it is evident that doctors in all countries had a higher income than other occupations. In addition, the highest values of both counterparts were witnessed in the USA.
Turning into detail, physicians and employees in other sectors in China and Canada shared the same income, with nearly 90 and about 60 thousand dollars, correspondingly. Likewise, in comparison with the aforementioned countries, Austrian workers in remaining jobs had an equal salary, whereas the figure for doctors was slightly lower, which was approximately 80 thousand dollars. Meanwhile, a remarkable difference between two profession groups was also observed in Germany, in which a 110 – thousand – dollar wage for doctors was considerably bigger than that of the remaining counterpart.
Regarding to other countries, Japanese physicians and other labors were paid similarly, with above 40 and nearly 35 thousand dollars, respectively. These figures were faintly higher than those of correspondent employees in Czech Republic, whose income was the lowest among 7 surveyed nations. By contrast, with over 120 thousand dollars, the number for American medical practitioners was 4 times higher than that of their Czech fellows. Furthermore, the number also resulted in a gap of approximately 10 thousand dollars between their salary and the income of remaining American professions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, likewise, regarding, similarly, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61777777778 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04890184643 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604444444444 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0505648 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.4 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0971130524049 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398185425317 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364640886798 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0600549935566 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284030683397 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.