The chart shows the average number of hours each day that Chinese, American, Turkish
and Brazilian tourists spent doing leisure activities while on holiday in Greece in August
2019.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make
comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The given bar chart illustrates the figure of time that visitors from four different countries spent for three recreative activities on a Greek holiday got up in August 2019.
It is clear that reading books was the most common in three different activities while visiting places was the activity that had the fewest participants. In addition, Chinese tourists was the most significant figure.
In American tourists, reading books was the play that travelers spent most time to enjoy with 5 hours, followed by some beach leisure activity at 4 hours, only one hour fewer than reading books. Visiting places was the least popular action accounted for 3 hours. With Turkish travellers game on the beach was the most common activity, people spent 5 hours to experience this while reading books was spent 4 hours. The figures are the opposite of those in the US but visiting places was not, it comprised 3 hours, two hours fewer than the highest number.
One of the two most volatile figures was Brazilians tourers time, beach activity time was the highest figure with 6 hours, followed by reading books took up 4 hours. Visiting places was the fewest figure with only 2 hours, equal to 1/3 of the highest figure. In term of Chinese tourists that spent most of time to reading books with 8 hours, this quantity was much different from the second figure was that sea games at 3 hours, 5 hours fewer than reading books. Visiting places was the acitivity that people spent only 1 hours to enjoy, this figure was fewest in whole bar chart.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 265.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79245283019 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34240856652 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437735849057 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 375.3 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8551438213 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.454545455 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128299043207 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665829132914 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414270407647 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102457225829 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269997919089 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.