The bar graph depicts the frequency of having fast food meals by Americans at restaurants from 2003 to 2013.The number of frequent fast food consumers dropped. Almost half of the Americans ate fast food in a restaurant either once or more then a few times a week between 2003 and 2013. It is worth nothing that more Americans chose not to eat junk food as frequently as they used to do so in the past.
Overall, according to data , many Americans who used to eat frequently at fast food restaurants has stopped doing so after a decade.
Further more , almost one of twenty Americans ate unhealthy food daily at a restaurant in 2003 while this rate decreased slightly over the period. It is interesting to note that around the same percentage of USA citizens never ate at restaurants. About 17% of Americans ate fast food joints several times a week and the ratio of such people increased in 2006 before it dropped to just over 15% in 2013.
Many Americans preferred eating junk food once a week. Their ratio ,though ,fell by few percentages over time. A similar percentage of Americans had unhealthy food once in a month and their ration went up. Individuals who rarely dined at a fast food restaurant accounted for around 15% of the total.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... 2003 to 2013. Overall according to data , many Americans who used to eat frequent...
^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ood in a restaurant either once or more then a few times a week between 2003 and 201...
^^^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ed to do so in the past. Further more , almost one of twenty Americans ate unhe...
^^
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ating junk food once a week. Their ratio ,though ,fell by few percentages over tim...
^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nk food once a week. Their ratio ,though ,fell by few percentages over time. A sim...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68181818182 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57342464554 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540909090909 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6497482243 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8333333333 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.25 5.23603664747 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341203168099 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135724093243 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850620274693 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228798010357 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770222659659 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.