The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given.
The given bar chart compares different nations in terms of phones owned by an per 100 people.
Overall, it is clear that while people in Italy own the most mobile phones, Denmark has the highest level of telephones ownership.
It can be seen from the chart that the number of mobile phones in Italy is 90, which is nearly 50 higher than the proportion of telephones in this country. The figures for mobile phones in Sweden and the UK are equal, at about 86, but the ownership of telephones in the former are lower than in the latter, at about nearly 60 and 70. The gap between the ownership of cell phones and landlines in Denmark is small.
The figures for landlines in Germany, Canada and the US range from above 60 to approximately 70. The lowest level of mobile phone ownership is found in Canada. Meanwhile, the number of cell phones in Germany is about 70, which is considerably higher than that in the US, at under 50.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ent nations in terms of phones owned by an per 100 people. Overall, it is clear...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nes and landlines in Denmark is small. The figures for landlines in Germany, Canad...
^^^
Line 6, column 97, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ange from above 60 to approximately 70. The lowest level of mobile phone ownership ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 768.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54437869822 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38585575681 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526627218935 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5374379917 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213534635418 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968417711883 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398524215479 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131611713621 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454784123741 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.