The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries.

Essay topics:

The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries.

The bar chart illustrates information about the number of cell phones and landlines per 100 people in seven countries.

In general, it is clear to see that the number of mobile phones in Europe is more than the figure for North America. Conversely, the number of landlines in North American is the most.

The highest number of mobile phones is in Italy with 90 users but it's also a country have the lowest number of landlines with around 40 users. Denmark has the highest quantity of landlines with nearly 90 people. On the other hand, Canada has the least quantity of cell phones with under 40 people. Surprisingly, Denmark is the only region have both the number of mobile phones and landlines over 80 customers.

Italy, Sweden, UK, Denmark are the top four countries in the number of mobile phones, over 80 clients. Among the given countries, except Denmark, the figure for landlines is all under 70 people.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Denmark) must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...ustomers. Italy, Sweden, UK, Denmark are the top four countries in the number of...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, so, in general, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 762.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82278481013 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42334821432 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537974683544 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.4636572144 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.6666666667 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386801422478 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161848436199 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123888902425 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252891272818 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13437311259 0.0819641961636 164% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.