The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries.
The graph illustrates that, given countries has number of landlines and cell phones per 100 people. In the graph, Blue colours indicate mobiles and Red colours evince landlines.
It is apparent from the graph that, Canada has 38 numbers of mobiles per 100 people, while there are huge no. of landlines compare to mobiles, it is 61. Next to that, US country has more mobiles compare to Canada, it is 48 percent, in which, no difference for landlines. Moreover, same use of cell phones in Germany compare to uses of landlines in US.
Albeit, Denmark is the only country, where just normal variation between mobiles and landlines, it is 6 percent. After that, the no. of mobiles has been steadily grows up country by country, it has 85, 87 and 90 for UK, Sweden, Italy etc., respectively. But, there are large contrasts in the use of landlines.
All in all, it is evident that, use of mobiles per 100 people is more than landlines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graph illustrates that, given countr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es and Red colours evince landlines. It is apparent from the graph that, Cana...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'noes', 'nos'?
Suggestion: noes; nos
...es per 100 people, while there are huge no. of landlines compare to mobiles, it is...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...compare to uses of landlines in US. Albeit, Denmark is the only country, whe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e contrasts in the use of landlines. All in all, it is evident that, use of m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'moreover', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.284263959391 0.268076937826 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.106598984772 0.116061578633 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0558375634518 0.0759168565197 74% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0203045685279 0.0366838410393 55% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0304568527919 0.0131127313244 232% => OK
Prepositions: 0.142131979695 0.155750635184 91% => OK
Participles: 0.010152284264 0.0379272487307 27% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.52002686406 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0203045685279 0.0210936926555 96% => OK
Particles: 0.00507614213198 0.00175180941692 290% => OK
Determiners: 0.0659898477157 0.0948980150116 70% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.010152284264 0.00967000014798 105% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1064.0 1161.00487805 92% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.9 83% => OK
Chars per words: 6.48780487805 5.90752243213 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73763899035 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.335365853659 0.337110787985 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.280487804878 0.247514529752 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.140243902439 0.171178102325 82% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0914634146341 0.112407865282 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52002686406 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567073170732 0.546246751206 104% => OK
Word variations: 48.3541463631 49.3433353143 98% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 8.93414634146 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.9090909091 23.0094962315 65% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.948672974 42.9750493124 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7272727273 135.714022679 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9090909091 23.0094962315 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.363636363636 0.689975730869 53% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.48048780488 338% => OK
Readability: 42.9578713969 47.7609492067 90% => OK
Elegance: 2.77419354839 2.94281807926 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359166983898 0.418131533498 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.136607087392 0.181151798455 75% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.121262550702 0.0850326197045 143% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.600038406797 0.706616315825 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.183623968689 0.157042692854 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176967171689 0.228904883108 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115613232684 0.108899403657 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.295613818933 0.367819155151 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0614995191235 0.0812612215331 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267047888178 0.316326947829 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111237969638 0.0921553760075 121% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70731707317 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.14146341463 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.08536585366 147% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.16585365854 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.02926829268 165% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 7.1512195122 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.