The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interested in certain sports.
The bar chart compares the percentage of UK residents in terms of six different sports in three examined years (1995, 2000 and 2005).
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that walking was the most popular physical activity in all period, while golf was the least common. Additionally, the number of people who enjoyed walking, swimming and rugby increased, the opposite was true with the other sports.
In 1995, the proportion of British attended to the walking was the highest, with over 40%, followed by playing snooker and tennis accounted for around 30% of surveyed participants. Meanwhile, nearly 25% of citizen chose rugby and this number was about 2% higher than swimming. In contrast, only having approximately 18% of reviewer said they liked to golf.
Over the one decade ensuing, the rate of people interested in six sports changed. Details, the percentage of residents in the UK walking and attending rugby increased slightly to just under 45% and about 27% respectively, while the data for swimming experienced a strong rise to above 25% of the population. By contrast, the figure for snooker decreased terribly to around 23%, while the amount of golfers only fell mildly to almost 15%. Regarding the final sport, tennis, the number of players in this subject also significantly went down to 22% in 2000 and remained the same in the next five years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, regarding, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03070175439 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65484959599 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618421052632 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2653440989 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.7 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143652119803 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542598010956 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541668234231 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886953261846 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486271391557 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.