Charts A and B show the share of the UK and Australian cinema market in 2001 and cinema admission in the UK and Australia from 1976 to 2006.
The bar chart compares the market share of cinema for the UK and Australia in 2001, and the line chart represents information about admission of cinema in the UK and Australia over 30 years.
Overall, it is seen clearly from the bar graph that films from the USA were the most favourite on the list. Moreover, the UK had the highest number of cinema admissions in the given period.
As per the first graph, nearly 75% and 68% of films have been screened in the UK and Australia was American ones respectively, which were the biggest percentage for both countries. Furthermore, there were 20% and 10% of movies from the UK and Australia screened in the Uk, which was 15% and 9% more than in Australia respectively, whereas other films accounted for 19% in Australia and around 5% in the united kingdom in 2001.
To comment with, the proportion of cinema admission for the Uk was closely 100 million in 1975, which was 70% higher than Australia. In 1995, the trend of the UK after reaching a peak of 125 million in 1977 was hugely decreased by nearly 70 million per year, while the rate for Australia remained relatively constant between 20 to 40 million over 5 years. After 1985, both countries showed increments in their trends, whereas the UK rose to over 140 million cinema admissions per year as well as Australia inclined to over 80 million in 2005.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Australia. In 1995, the trend of the UK after reaching a peak of 125 million in ...
^^
Line 7, column 487, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... 140 million cinema admissions per year as well as Australia inclined to over 80 million i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, moreover, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67916666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53968160187 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.0235796604 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.375 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399704154081 0.215688989381 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19536477319 0.103423049105 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139407634385 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276760638726 0.15604864568 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14030620657 0.0819641961636 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.