The bar graph and the table illustrate the number of audiences joining entertainment venues and ticket expenses for these in the year of 2009.
It can be seen clearly in the first chart that there were totally 3 categories of venues including sports, theme parks and cinemas, which had a big difference in terms of attendance between these ones. While sports kept the lowest proportion of people arriving to watch with less than 200 thousands, cinemas took its advantage of excess 1000 thousands audiences turning up to watch movies, which was almost 5 times higher. In addition, the type of entertainment venue of theme parks stayed at the middle with around 380 thousands people.
On the other hand, the table shows more specific information about the money paid for purchasing single ticket and family ticket (4 people) in 6 provided events. The admission prices in 2009 generally reduced in order of venues. Football games tend to possess the most luxurious prices of ticket due to their highest top 3 ranks of AFL, NRL and NRU. With $75 per ticket and $298 for 4 people, AFL led the first position, followed by NRL ($73 for 1 ticket and $290 for family ticket) and NRU ($71 for 1 ticket and $280 for family ticket), respectively. In contrast, cinema was the form of event that had the most affordable ticket price of $15 if going alone and $55 if coming with the whole family of four.
In general, it seems that because of the cheap price, cinema appealed more attendees than the others, especially sports by the year shown.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 191, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'these' instead.
Suggestion: these
...fference in terms of attendance between these ones. While sports kept the lowest proportio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while, as to, in addition, in contrast, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 266.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68045112782 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4995250835 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 106.607317073 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593984962406 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7369863233 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119806743551 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057607059915 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462241630039 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.071517303221 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328094911083 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.