The charts below give information about different types of waste disposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011. Summarize the information be selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts provide insight into the percentage of various kinds of waste discarded in a nation between 1960 and 2011.
Overall, it can be seen that during the period, there was a noticeable decrease in the amount of paper, textiles, and other waste disposed of in that country. In contrast, some items such as plastic, wood, and food were thrown away in a larger quantity, whereas, the proportion of green waste, metal, and glass discarded stayed at a constant level.
Looking at the charts in more detail, in 1960, paper made up a quarter of the whole chart, and dominated other waste items, before declining to 15% and being replaced in its top rank by food waste in 2011. A similar trend could be observed in the number of textiles, standing at 17% in 1960 and experiencing a downward tendency in 2011, about 11%. Also, the percentage of other waste materials decreased significantly from 12% in 1960 to 4% in 2011.
Turning to the opposite tendency, there was a remarkable upsurge in the amount of food during the period from 1960 to 2011. More specifically, food constituted roughly 12% in 1960 and then experienced a 9% increase in 2011, and came out on top of the chart. Moreover, the amount of plastic waste thrown away increased substantially by 10% and accounted for 18% in 2011. The proportion of wood discarded in 2011, which stood at 8%, doubled compared to 1960. Finally, the portion of glass, metal, and green waste remained nearly unchanged during the period, with 5%, 8%, and 9%, in turn.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, look, moreover, so, then, whereas, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75378787879 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59362950836 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549242424242 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.482926829268 1449% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0437249227 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.090909091 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181488524264 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764957983547 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386869231262 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116219597659 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047982585145 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, look, moreover, so, then, whereas, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75378787879 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59362950836 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549242424242 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.482926829268 1449% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0437249227 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.090909091 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181488524264 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764957983547 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386869231262 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116219597659 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047982585145 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.