The given pie charts compare the percentages of different regions people along with five categories of resources in which individuals have been investing around the globe. Additionally, the distribution of the consumption also illustrate in the graph. An interesting point to be noted that, maximum world population belongs to Asia.
It is manifest from this graph that, people around the world spend less on clothing whereas the highest spending accounts for other category. In addition, the population of the globe is equal for America and Europe while the other region has lowest count of population. Furthermore, the consumption of resources is maximum in USA & Europe combined.
When it come to the distribution of population accross the world, 57% people, which is the highest, live in Asia region but only 10% individuals live in the Africa. Moreover, the equal percentage of people, which is 14%, are living in both regions, which are America and Europe.
Stating further, only 6% investment has been done in cloth item in the world while 40%, which is the highest, investment accounts for the others category. This investment declines in food, transport and housing with 24%, 18% and 12% respectively. To add on, 60% of the consumption of the resources has done by USA & Europe whereas only 40% consuption accounts for other regions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the lowest'.
Suggestion: has the lowest
...erica and Europe while the other region has lowest count of population. Furthermore, the c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comes'?
Suggestion: comes
...um in USA & Europe combined. When it come to the distribution of population accro...
^^^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...he highest, investment accounts for the others category. This investment declines in f...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22119815668 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83239031474 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3461683278 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0860715680506 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362671788737 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0260254148285 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0566255551163 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018001631306 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.