The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
the four pie charts illustrate the statistic information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and also anticipation for 2050
In general, we can see that there is a big chance of the ages from 2000 to 2050 in both these countries. However, the population on the ages between 15 and 59 years usually accounted for the largest percentage.
In 2000, it can be seen from the first two pie charts that in Yemen, the majority of people was between 0 and 14 years with 50,1% while people from 15 to 59 years predicted that it will have the highest percentage in 2050 with 57,3%. Besides, there will be growth in the percentage of people from 15 to 59 years and people over 60 years from 2000 to 2050. However, the percentage under 14 years will decrease in this period.
in the second two pie charts show that in Italy, the number of people from 15 to 59 years have the highest percentage between 2000 and 2050 and the percentage of people over 60 years is higher than people under 14 years. There will be a drastic rise in the percentage of people over 60 years in 2000 and 2050 from 24,1% to 42,3%. In contrast, there will have a decrease in the percentage of people under 14 years and from 15 to 59 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the four pie charts illustrate the statisti...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...4 years will decrease in this period. in the second two pie charts show that in ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, second, so, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.33913043478 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33340579598 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.373913043478 0.547539520022 68% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.3059904911 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.75 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.75 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13482271283 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791624303367 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922618287075 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152292780558 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128299444996 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.9 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.48 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.