The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts illustrate the proportion regarding the ages of Italian and Yemen residents on three different categories between 2000 and 2050.
It is clear that Yemen Italian adults occupy approximately half of the populations. Overall, significant and moderate increases can be witnessed in the number of residents, with the except for declines in Italian adults and Yemen youngsters.
As is observed, the majority of Yemen residents was between 0-14 years old at roughly 50,1%, while those of Italians was sharply lower (approximately 14,3%) by 2000. In comparison, Yemen elders accounted for about 23%, while the figure for Italians was trivial.
In 2050, Yemen adults and elders are expected to grow steadily from 46,3%-57,3% and 3,6%-5,7% respectively. However, a moderate decline can be seen in Yemen to exactly 37%. During the period shown, Italian elders almost doubled, rising from 14,3% to 42.3%. In contrast, both Italian youngsters and adults are predicted to decrease insignificantly.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n Italian adults and Yemen youngsters. As is observed, the majority of Yemen re...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the figure for Italians was trivial. In 2050, Yemen adults and elders are exp...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, while, except for, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50649350649 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.919017156 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62987012987 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8497041218 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2222222222 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12774420392 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570580487802 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487551565547 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0890490556191 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04180436168 0.0819641961636 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.