The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the inforamtion by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
These pie charts illustrate the proportion of four type of meals containing three different nutritional substances on average which could be harmful, unless it is consumed moderately.
During dinner, almost twice as many sodium is consumed as added sugar, 43% and 23% respectively. In addition, 37% of this meal is comprised saturated fat. Regarding lunch meal, there is no great deal of difference between sodium (29%) and saturated (26%), however the figure for added sugar is nearly one-fifth. When it comes to snacks, a far more proportion of added sugar than sodium and saturated fat, 42%, 21% and 14% in turn. A similar percentage of nutrients are consumed in breakfast, around 14-16%.
Overall, it is clear that in the USA sodium is consumed relatively more in both lunch and dinner, however, snack meals contain significant amount as much added sugar as any other nutrients. An interesting point is that the share of all nutrients of breakfast is almost the same.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 32, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun sodium seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much sodium', 'a good deal of sodium'.
Suggestion: much sodium; a good deal of sodium
...rately. During dinner, almost twice as many sodium is consumed as added sugar, 43% and 23%...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rients of breakfast is almost the same.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.075 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74291701479 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6625 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5718530875 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116368071363 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519198015884 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517966593674 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951475626987 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551175289325 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.