The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,
and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts provide information about consuming three types of nutrients which are added to everyday meals in the USA, measured in percentage.
With the first glance, it can be noted that people intake sodium and saturated fat mostly in dinner time. However, sugar is almost consumed in the snack time which is completely reasonable for that period.
Nonetheless, obviously, people take in sodium preferably in dinner time and after that in launch at over 70% totally. However, the consumption of sodium shows reduction during breakfast and snacks time with about 14% for each one. Anyway, in the case of saturated fat there are almost similar results with sodium intake. Conversely, sugar consumption trend is completely different from the other two nutrients. Clearly, the most time of consumption for added sugar is in snacks time at 42%.
All in all, while sodium and saturated fat have similarity in consumption for individuals by the most consumption time in the dinner and the least in breakfast, added sugar has shown a different intake in snacks time.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, conversely, first, however, if, nonetheless, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14367816092 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67742701207 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8453801712 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4444444444 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0717197136899 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0355355259879 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605286771611 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0716523946975 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760621169088 0.0819641961636 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.