The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
The given charts demonstrate the average percentages of three types of nutrients, sodium, saturated fats and added sugars, in typical meals. Three charts are divided into four section containing breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacks.
At first, highest amount of Sodium consumed in dinner which was 43%, near the half of the total amount. While people of the USA ate fourteen percent of sodium in both breakfast and snacks, they take one-third percentage in lunch.
In case of saturated fat, consumption percentage in dinner is highest likely to the sodium. In breakfast only 16% of saturated fat is available, though 5% more in snacks and more 5% in lunch than snacks.
Unlikely to sodium and saturated fat, added sugar was eaten more in snacks and the percentage is 42 of the totals. However, 23 percent added sugar consumed in dinner. There is only a little variation between the percentage of saturated fat in breakfast and lunch.
According to the charts, huge amount of the nutrients was eaten in dinner, which may be harmful for body. Yet, at snacks and lunch time, ingredients were taken moderately.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the highest'.
Suggestion: , the highest
...st, lunch, dinner and snacks. At first, highest amount of Sodium consumed in dinner whi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the highest'.
Suggestion: is the highest
...d fat, consumption percentage in dinner is highest likely to the sodium. In breakfast only...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04347826087 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57704990258 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554347826087 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.1051415934 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.3636363636 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7272727273 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158019120098 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643394113605 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723465855526 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962632560183 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709013341355 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.