The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the average proportions of Americans’ nutrition intake, namely sodium, saturated fat and sugar, all of which cause health issues if exceedingly consumed.
Overall, while a huge amount of fat and sodium is found in dinner meals, sugar is reported to be mainly contained in everyday snacks.
Regarding the sodium intake, dinner accounted for the largest percentage, which is exactly 43%. This figure is followed by lunch meals with 29% of sodium consumed by Americans, whereas breakfast and snacks both contributed only 14% of the daily consumption. There is a similar trend for the absorption of saturated fat, with dinner and lunch respectively topping the chart with 37% and 26%. Moreover, the remaining portions belong to breakfast and snacks, with breakfast representing the lowest amount fat of at only 16%. As regards to the sugar intake, there are a few changes in the amount used in meals. First, snacks make up a significant proportion of 42%, which is followed by dinner and lunch with 23% and 19% accordingly. Lastly, breakfast remains a trivial contributor with 16%, making it the healthiest meal among four sectors with 3 nutrient consumptions being all below 20%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, if, lastly, moreover, regarding, so, whereas, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21025641026 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80605150511 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625641025641 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0440278811 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.888888889 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 5.23603664747 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115833930179 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486710558007 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440095677075 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845259738324 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00669865578545 0.0819641961636 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.