The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram depicts information regarding the consumption of three types of nutrients in avverage, the overused nutrients can caused several detrimental impacts on human physical health. Overall, Sodium is frequently used in Dinner while in Snacks and Beakfast, people minimize these nutrients. Moreover, Saturated fat is rich in Dinner and Breakfast is the least. In addition, Add sugar is the most intensive substance in Snacks and Breakfast witnesses the least.
In respect to Sodium, Dinner accounts for approximately a haft, at 43% while the lesser using nutrient is Lunch, with 29%. Additionally, Snacks and Breakfast witness the same propotion of using Sodium in USA, with 14%.
Regarding Saturated fat, 37% of this nutrient is used in Dinner, occupying over one-third, followed by 26% of Lunch, which exactly is higher 10% than Breakfast. In addition, Snacks is a minority nutrients, with 21%.
In term of Added sugar, the USA used the most the substance in Snacks, with approximately two-fifths, at 42% which nearly is doubled the figure for Dinner, at 32%. However, Breakfast and Lunch are documented the least meal consumption with 16% and 19% accordingly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34054054054 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88204942907 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2473601619 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0603386742632 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0236209041506 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034976928601 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0386929821047 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181961198271 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.