the charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Given pie charts describe about the average content of three different compenents in four routine meals consumed by peoples in USA. The amount of nutrients varied video in each four meals.
Overall, dinner provided maximum sodium and saturated fats, on the otherhands, snacks were the richest sourse of added sugars.
Firstly,in breakfast sodium content is only 14 percentage and saturated fats and added sugars were also lower with 16% percentage each. Thus the nutritional content of the breakfast stood the lowest in contrast, dinner accounted for almost half of the sodium and saturated fat intake with 43 and 37 percentage respectively. Added sugars were also remind high in dinner but in second potion with 23 percentage.
Secondly, the lunch accounted for almost 30 percentage of sodium intake and one fourth of satarted fats, were as the added sugars wereally comparatively low in lunch. However, the snacks were the richest source of added sugars with more than 40 percentage, but the saturated fats and sodium content were lower in snacks.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...richest sourse of added sugars. Firstly,in breakfast sodium content is only 14 per...
^^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...re also lower with 16% percentage each. Thus the nutritional content of the breakfas...
^^^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'reminded'.
Suggestion: reminded
...ge respectively. Added sugars were also remind high in dinner but in second potion wit...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 300, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...t the saturated fats and sodium content were lower in snacks.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, thus, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23076923077 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57727461783 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556213017751 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7128364008 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0605419891853 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0304202819348 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437525292712 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0407032534755 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400662925477 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.