The two line charts provide information about the percentage in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time taken for doing households work from 1920 to 2019 in a nation.
Overview, the percentage of refrigerator was the lowest at first but then outraced the others at the end of the chart while there are some fluctuations in washing machine and the upward trend showed by vacuum cleaner figure. On the other hand, the number of hours people spend for doing housework showed an generally downward trend within about a century.
Firstly, in 1920, refrigerator figure hold the bottom position at approximately below 5% while the figure of vacuum cleaner was about 30% and washing machine reached 40%. Meanwhile, at that time, people spent about 50 hours per week doing housework. In general, most of aforementioned percentages had increases with the most significant one was refrigerator while the number of hours sharply decreased from 1920 to 1960. In between 1960 and 1980, the using of vacuum cleaner and refrigerator kept inclining sharply, at which point the washing machine and hours figures displayed slight declines. From 1980 to 2019, while all of the percentage of households with electrical devices increased slightly, in contrast, the amount of time kept on its way going downward to around 10 hours per week at the end of the chart.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 304, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...people spend for doing housework showed an generally downward trend within about a...
^^
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ight declines. From 1980 to 2019, while all of the percentage of households with electrica...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, then, while, in contrast, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08035714286 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73136952174 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.2711813712 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.25 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203462091199 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995612405193 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884500967722 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173157818783 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100173978716 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.