The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003.
The two pie charts present comparable information about power production in typical country in the year 1985 and 2003. split by energy resource.
Overall, there is significant change in utilizing energy from different resources, oil was still the dominant source despite a decrease in its proportion. Conversely, this country became more dependent on natural gas, coal and renewable sources.
Regarding oil, there was the biggest proportion during 1985 and 2003, which comprised over half at 52%, followed by dramatic fall to 39%. Likewise, the consumption of nuclear power decreased substantially from roughly a quarter of the total energy volume to only 8%.
In contrast, natural gas went through a period of marked increased from 10% to 23% over eighteen-year period. Coal also experienced a nearly threefold rise to 22% from 8%, growing from 8% to 22%. However, after nearly two decades, the one exception is hydro power, which remained stable at 4%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Split
...ical country in the year 1985 and 2003. split by energy resource. Overall, there i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, however, if, likewise, regarding, so, still, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34210526316 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77615988587 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.730263157895 0.547539520022 133% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3200534094 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2222222222 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249169899643 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863048956122 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532659531002 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141987356804 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508437427579 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.