The charts below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The three pie charts compare and contrast the data on the changes in the percentage of awarded degrees in the four aspects (namely medicine, law, business, computer science) at the National University in 1990, 2000 and 2010. Generally speaking, students graduating from Computer science accounted for the biggest proportion, whereas that from Law were always the lowest.
As can be seen from the charts that the proportion of the two fields including Medicine and Law witnessed a slight fluctuation during this period of time. To specify, just under one-third degrees was from Medicine field in 1990 and the figure marginally reduced to 25% five years later, then went up back to 30% in 2010. Also, the percentage of Law degree fluctuate around 15%, ended with 20% in the year of 2010.
Besides, the figure for the rest aspects saw the opposite trend. In detail, students who graduated from the computer science department generated by about one-third in 1990 and it continuously increased to 45% at the end of the period. On the other hand, the three years experienced a downward trend in the Business field from 30% in 1990 to 15% in 2010.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 140, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...nessed a slight fluctuation during this period of time. To specify, just under one-third degre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, then, third, whereas, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9170984456 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55907150133 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59585492228 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.126863106 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.625 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182136482263 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804453813223 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643833267221 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125237136223 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182000048101 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.