The charts below show the growth in the population in some of the world’s largest cities as well as the population distribution in urban and rural areas.
The bar chart reveals the population growth that happened in 5 cities in the year of 1970, 1990 and 2010, while the table details the top five largest cities ranking in terms of the population. Meanwhile, the line chart given compares the population growth in the rural and urban area over the world.
It is clear that while a significant increase in the population can be witnessed in the five biggest cities over the four decades, the ranking of the top 5 most dense cities changed greatly. Moreover, population growth in rural and urban area saw a conflicting trend - one was increasing and the other one was decreasing.
As shown in the data given in bar chart, evidently Tokyo was always in the dominant position in terms of population over the four decades, raising from staggering 15 millions in 1970, to 23 millions in 1990 and finally 28 millions in 2010. Likewise, a similar pattern can be noticed in Shanghai, where number of residents increased twofold from 1970 to reach 21 millions in 2010. Noteworthy is the fact that while the growth in New York city was very stable, number of people in Bombay increased significantly from a mere 5 million to staggering 27 billions, just 1 billion less than that of Tokyo by 2010.
In regard to the most dense cities, evidently, all the cities except Tokyo were dropped out of the top 5 ranking, where Tokyo's population increased over 4 times and ranked at the top in 2010. In addition, the overall population in the top five ranking in 1950 was staggering 4 times smaller than that in 2010. Lastly, from 1990, while the number of people in rural area started decreasing, people living in urban cities grew significantly and overtook that in rural somewhere between 2000 and 2010. By 2010, number of people in rural and urban area were 3 billions and 4 billions respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, lastly, likewise, moreover, so, while, in addition, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 965.302439024 158% => OK
No of words: 318.0 196.424390244 162% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78301886792 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60251153742 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452830188679 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 283.868780488 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.2302256492 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.272727273 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9090909091 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234699031689 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113104654534 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850368778858 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187146177046 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108717370468 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.