The charts below show information about the number of kilometres travelled in an average month and the distribution of vehicle types in Britain.
The line chart illustrates the distance travelled for three distinct demands in Britain in the period from 1990 to 2010. At the same time, the pie charts demonstrate the percentage of vehicle types.
Overall, it is clear that there were a number of changes in the distance and the kind of vehicles in the survey period.
Now, turning to detail, the number of kilometres travelled for transport overwhelmed in the first stage, with 6500 (km), compared to personal and commuting, just under 3000 (km) and nearly 2000 (km) respectively. At the end of the stage, although the figure still remained the first rank, this data hit the lowest point at 6000 (km). while the number of distance travelled for commuting grew moderately to 2500(km), the statistic of personal witnessed a fell slightly to 3000(km).
In regard to the distribution of vehicle kinds, in 1990, cars captured the lion’s share of the proportion with 63%, following by trucks with a quarter. There were no significant differences in the portions of buses, motorcycles and other, with their figures ranging from 2% to 6%. In 2010, while the percentage of cars declined slightly to 59%, trucks increased by 5%. Besides, both buses and motorcycles fell by 1%, whereas the category labelled ‘other’ increased by 1%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, so, still, whereas, while, kind of, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1062.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00943396226 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72984050667 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594339622642 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4360276455 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.2 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140890847711 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516253408711 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441888489864 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882374194083 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418366034863 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.