The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.
A glimpse at the bar charts given compares the prevalence of science related education, occupation and investment in research between developing and developed countries in the year of 1980 and 1990.
Generally speaking, an overall significant increase in science related education and expenditure can be witnessed over a ten-year period. Moreover, involvement from affluent countries always surpassed their deprived counterparts.
As seen from the information provided, it is obvious that in 1980 average years of study in rich countries outnumber poor countries 4 to 1. Although the average schooling raised by 1 year in developing countries, it was still just one-third that of developed countries after a decade. Likewise, a similar pattern can be noticed in the number of scientists and technicians in both type of countries.
As of expenses on R&D projects, the investment in industrialized and developing countries suffered greatly. In 1980, spending on research projects by both categories were under 150 US billion. In 1990, while the investment in developing countries halved, 200 US billion more were invested in R&D projects in developed countries, which was doubled that of the amount spent by them 10 years ago.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...ts by both categories were under 150 US billion. In 1990, while the investment in devel...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 263, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
... in developing countries halved, 200 US billion more were invested in R&D projects in d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, moreover, still, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49473684211 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09550652799 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615789473684 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.580516469 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262532476828 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103618169693 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749835741135 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163795459176 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070787244112 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.