The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.
The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.
A glimpse at the bar charts given compares the prevalence of science related education, occupation and investment in research between developing and developed countries in the year of 1980 and 1990.
Generally speaking, an overall significant increase in science related education and expenditure can be witnessed over a ten-year period. Moreover, involvement from affluent countries always surpassed their deprived counterparts.
As seen from the information provided, it is obvious that industrialised countries participated more than developed countries on science field training and employment. Average years of study in rich countries outnumber poor countries 4 to 1 in 1980 and 3 to 1 in 1990 . Likewise, a similar pattern can be noticed in the number of scientists and technicians in both type of countries, having 40 per thousand people working in science field in developed countries as opposed to 10 per thousand in developing countries in 1980 with a twofold rise in 1990.
As of expenses on R&D projects, the investment in affluent and deprived countries differed greatly. Numbering under 150 billion US dollars, spending on research projects by both categories were comparable in 1980. After 10 years, while the investment in developing countries halved, 200 billion USD more were spent in R&D projects in developed countries, which was nearly doubled that of the amount spent by them 10 years ago.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ntries 4 to 1 in 1980 and 3 to 1 in 1990 . Likewise, a similar pattern can be noti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47302904564 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12101668815 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551867219917 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.296226293 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.9 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.503878689687 0.215688989381 234% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224652715406 0.103423049105 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.272610828674 0.0843802449381 323% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.361596663391 0.15604864568 232% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.333277058935 0.0819641961636 407% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.