The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.
The charts providing the information about two countries in terms of their participation in education and investment on research and development between 1980 and 1990.
Overall, developed industrialized countries performance were tremendously in compare to developing countries. Industrialized countries outraced developing in terms of quality of education, scientists and technician and funding their research and development.
In 1980, developed countries had about 8.2% of average years of schooling, and had more than 40 scientists and technicians per 1000 people. it means peoples are well educated and responsible toward their nations. Then, figures showed it rose to approximately 9% and about 70 people join in scientists and technicians’ team in 1990, where on developing countries had less than 2.5% of average years of schooling and had less than 15 people in scientists and technicians’ teams in 1980, significantly lower than developed countries, However, it rose to approximately by 3.5% of average schooling and just increase 5 people in scientists’ teams in 1990.
It also can see that the reason behind developed countries were top in all categories is that it invested more than 180 billion dollars in 1980, and increasing their cash funds to approximately 340 billion in 1990. Whereas, only less than 40 billion where spend in 1980 and reduce to 20 billion in 1990 by developing countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ntists and technicians per 1000 people. it means peoples are well educated and res...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51376146789 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26532050291 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51376146789 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 108.60824094 43.030603864 252% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 150.25 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273844271488 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139341616042 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811403299588 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198168220862 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832321848919 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.