The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare the change of local government spending on nine aspects for two different years (2010 and 2015).
Overall, the vast majority of the expenditure were education, healthcare, pensions and defence, whereas transport, culture and leisure and other aspects were expended least.
In 2010, education made up 24% of the expenditure and became the highest aspect which is expended by local government. Despite its decrease in 2015, it continued to be the major outlay with the percentage of 21%. This was followed by healthcare with 21% of expenditure but slightly decreased in 2015, at 20%. Interestingly, pensions remained unchanged with the percentage of 19%. For defence, there was a small decrease, from 17% in 2010 to 14% in 2015.
Additionally, welfare increased by 5%, going from 8% to 13%. There was a twofold increase in interest in borrowing, from 5% to 10%. In 2010, transport, culture and leisure and other expenditure were the smallest expenditure, 3%, 2%, 1% respectively. Five years later, transport, culture and leisure reduced to 1% each while other spending stayed the same.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and other aspects were expended least. In 2010, education made up 24% of the ex...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24309392265 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87302379781 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602209944751 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5167692917 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2727272727 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4545454545 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148320393912 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572218441765 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533296169907 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955555857288 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060735427448 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.