The charts below show the main methods of transportation for people travelling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009.
The pie charts compare the different in the means of transport for people coming to one university for study and work in 2004 and 2009.
It is evident from the given charts that the significant changes were seen at three out of five modes of transport, namely: bus, bicycle, and car. Furthermore, while car was by far the most favorable mean in the first year examined, after 5 years, bus overtook that of car.
In 2004, just above a half of staff and students who travelled to this university chose to go by car, followed by bus, which made up 33 per cent of total methods of transportation. Bicycle, walking, and train constituted the relatively smaller percentages of means (at 9,4, and 3 per cent, respectively).
After a half decade, the proportion of people decided to commute by bus increased sharply to 46 per cent, which could attribute to the new bus stop at this university in 2006. The similar trend could also be observed in the rate of bicycle users (nearly doubled that in 2004), train passengers, and pedestrians (rose marginally by 1 to 2 per cent). In contrast, due to the changes of car parking in 2008, the percentage of people enjoying traveling by car to this university witnessed a spectatular drop to 28 per cent.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69266055046 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76642016852 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596330275229 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 21.9427522203 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 127.875 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234123793843 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112295653304 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.175946156672 0.0843802449381 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193357153421 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.217236385532 0.0819641961636 265% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.